(2024-06-28 7:08)Siris Wrote: I would be curious how those of us in the mythic persuasion would fit in your theory.
(2024-06-28 14:32)Hawk_Fox_Girl Wrote: I second Siris's question as a draconic shapeshifter how would that part of me fit in? If there were n mythical/magical creatures then how do I have this theriotype?
It's because I believe the theriotype isn't actually the smallest particle of the story. I love theriotypes and identify myself as feline, more specifically as a cat. However, I think of things more as "traits". For example, you can have a strong feeling of having paws instead of hands, or you can feel your tail, wings, and so on. When we search for theriotypes, we compile all these traits into a list and try to find a species that checks all the boxes. I don't think this approach is bad at all because it greatly simplifies things, but identifying as an animal also allows us to reason about it on a personal and psychological level. I think it actually reflects empathetic behavior (identifying as a specific theriotype), and ultimately comes down to all these traits.
Identifying as a mythical creature isn't strange at all; those creatures were created based on existing creatures and share the same traits as existing animals. It's these traits that allow us to identify with those creatures, even though they don't exist in nature.
To illustrate with a concrete example: plants. I recall reading an article about someone who married a plant. Some saw it as a curiosity, others as madness. Right now, it kind of makes sense to me; humans have empathy towards anything that comes from nature, and plants are part of nature. Rough estimates suggest we share around 20-30% of genes with plants, though this number may vary. It's safe to say there are significant overlaps in basic biological processes between humans and plants. So, if a therian tells me they identify as a plant, I would believe it because I believe there are common traits in my own belief system. (Though, who am I to judge anyway.)
We often discuss obvious traits and characteristics like paws, tails, behaviors, etc., but there's more to biology that one might overlook. For instance, the sun is a crucial component of life. Plants process sunlight, and animals bask in its warmth and light; our cells use sunlight to create various hormones and vitamins. While most people know about vitamin D and the sun, did you know we also produce melatonin (I do mean melatonin and not melanin here) from sun exposure, through our skin and not just in the brain glands? This comes from recent studies, so it should be taken with a grain of salt, but it highlights that there are many traits and sensations that go beyond our usual set of characteristics.
(2024-06-28 22:06)Wolf Wrote: My only problem with that point of view is, humans are animals, and have primitive instincts of their own as well. So, how are you decerning human instincts from non-human, which cannot be explained by evolution of human brain alone?
What kind of human-specific instincts? Can you give some examples?