| |
| RE: ✦ Alienation-based Psychological Theriantropy |
|
Posted in: Explanations of Therianthropy Posted by: LemLem - Yesterday 22:39
|
|
(Yesterday 14:28)Savva Wrote: @LemLem
Thank you for taking your time to write such a thoughtful response! I find your experience especially interesting because it shows how nonhuman identity can precede *conscious* alienation, even if alienation later helps us understand ourselves.
You mentioned recognizing your nonhumanity before you understood wider human society. I wouldn't want to dismiss that experience, but I do wonder how early we begin absorbing social expectations, long before we can recognize them consciously.
For example, a 2000 study examined parents' expectations of their infants' crawling abilities. Mothers tended to underestimate girls' and overestimate boys' abilities, despite the infants demonstrating essentially identical motor performance. This suggests that various societally constructed expectations (not just gender roles!) can influence how adults perceive children even before those children can speak. It doesn't tell us how early children internalize these expectations, or explain nonhuman identity, but it makes me wonder how much we absorb from our social environment before we're able to make sense of it ourselves.
I also really liked what you said about animals giving us something observable to compare ourselves to. Thanks you again for your reply <3
Much food for thought.
Very early indeed, from parents to media characters, we're prompted to imitate not only behaviors and vocabulary but also emotional responses and thought patterns, and the younger a child is the more eager to absorb the framework on how the world operates. Which is why I phrased it around my own conscious awareness--I didn't realize people to have unique experiences of the world past simple taste preferences until the age of 17, and saw every societal expectations as a 'their choice, their problem' until they started nonconsensually expecting them of me. As a toddler/preschooler, I was perfectly happy in my tiny clueless bubble of existence as far as I remember (and if I weren't, I bit someone about it lol)
Of course, happy to feed the discussion!
|
|
| RE: ✦ Alienation-based Psychological Theriantropy |
|
Posted in: Explanations of Therianthropy Posted by: Savva - Yesterday 14:28
|
|
@Neon Rosettes
Thank you, I really appreciate the heads up! I'll try to create another edit-compilation post around the 2 week mark and link it under the original, but no promises. I'll just have to figure it out :"] Maybe it won't even be needed, we'll just have to see.
@LemLem
Thank you for taking your time to write such a thoughtful response! I find your experience especially interesting because it shows how nonhuman identity can precede *conscious* alienation, even if alienation later helps us understand ourselves.
You mentioned recognizing your nonhumanity before you understood wider human society. I wouldn't want to dismiss that experience, but I do wonder how early we begin absorbing social expectations, long before we can recognize them consciously.
For example, a 2000 study examined parents' expectations of their infants' crawling abilities. Mothers tended to underestimate girls' and overestimate boys' abilities, despite the infants demonstrating essentially identical motor performance. This suggests that various societally constructed expectations (not just gender roles!) can influence how adults perceive children even before those children can speak. It doesn't tell us how early children internalize these expectations, or explain nonhuman identity, but it makes me wonder how much we absorb from our social environment before we're able to make sense of it ourselves.
I also really liked what you said about animals giving us something observable to compare ourselves to. Thanks you again for your reply <3
Much food for thought.
@Rainshine1220
I really appreciate how personal your reply is! It really resonated with me how you didn't necessarily feel excluded from human society at first, but found something that connected with you more elsewhere. That's very similar to my own experience. I could also relate to being an observer and learning to fit in by gathering enough information to make the "right" choices in social situations, even if that doesn't necessarily mean those interactions come naturally to me.
The thread you linked is actually something I considered while writing my essay! Personally, I don't think misanthropy drives theriantropy so much as alienation from wider human society can sometimes lead to misanthropy. As a counter-example, neither I nor my two irl therian friends are misanthropes. I think it's not uncommon to want to fit in and enjoy "normal" human company, and to feel bitter or frustrated when you can't. Instead of hating others, one may perceive it as a personal failing instead.
Thanks again for sharing your experience! And good luck with your zoology and conservation studies, it sounds like you've found something that genuinely makes you happy <3
If I could do it all over again, I might have gone into zoology too :"]
|
|
| RE: ✦ Alienation-based Psychological Theriantropy |
|
Posted in: Explanations of Therianthropy Posted by: Rainshine1220 - Yesterday 12:14
|
|
hello! thanks for writing this essay, I really enjoyed reading it ^^, gave me some much needed time to reflect.
when I was reading those first few paragraphs my immediate thought was on nature versus nurture. a classic debate. the innate things we all have because of our species, opposable thumbs, grab reflexes etc etc. and the things we learn, are taught, subconciously or conciously, over the years. For me personally, I really resonated with that idea of having to know social cues, unspoken rules and rites without understanding them. I struggle with this stuff on a daily basis, over and over. as opposed to these 'unwritten human tendancies' I find it much easier to perceive physical signs, in other words the innate things. I am looking at and interpreting the base, natural fibres of humans and how they co-operate. but any more is a struggle. in that way, i definatley fit it more with an animalistic mindset, where I need little other than these base feelings to survive. its also important for me to consider where and who I learned many of my behaviours from. in my case, that wasn't people. I am an 'observer' some might say. I very rarely speak, sticking to the fringes of conversation and watching physical cues which I can take as my own to fit in better. is this probably my autism? oh yes, most definitely. The things that i observe have a huge impact on how i develop and act, those in my childhood most profoundly. I grew up watching the cats in my household, spending more time with them than my family and understanding them better. was in awe of the red kites people told stories about that i saw in the sky over my school. I would sit at lunch watching and mimicking them, rather than playing tag or making friends. even when I was with friends, my mind was in the world around me as a collective, unable to focus or understand the people who seemed so- needlessly complex. As a kid I just didnt see the need. people seemed to get the memo if I hissed or growled at them and would back off, no words needed. I could be polite in my body language whilst saying little, and mimicking the creatures around me who did the same. I could watch nature documentaries on the TV absorbed in the natural world. how a crocodile mother took care of her young, and i would mirror it for attention from my own mother. at some point this became abnormal, i'm not quite sure when. but by then, I had observed it so much it was my normal, my baseline. I couldn't get rid of it, and I didn't want to. again, why should I? that was a simpler way and it made so much more sense. I continue to surround myself with these things. there is a cat sat on my lap as i'm typing, wind blowing in through my window and I know somewhere in the skies outside the kites are searching for food. So its less that I didnt fit in to human society, at least to start with. I drifted from it and got left behind sure, but it started off with realising I fit in BETTER somewhere else.
I'll poke you towards a thread I made an age ago, that reallllly needs updating: https://forums.therian-guide.com/Thread-Does-misanthropy-drive-therianthropy-my-theory
it is my most popular thread, and probably for good reason. I dont think you, or i, am alone in thinking or struggling with this. It's good to see it written about 
now away from me writing my own essays (sorry X33) and on to the questions you asked!
I think ive answered the first couple, or 3 or maybe even 4 or 5 in my ramble back there, so ill leave those alone.
instead I will focus on this last one:
If alienation can lead people in so many different directions, what do you think makes an animal identity resonate specifically?
I think thats a big question. and its not to say that there arent other things that people similar to me have latched on to instead. like you said, people find solace in all sorts of things. religion, meditation, fiction. but there are some interesting points. why, for example, are therians more common than plantkin, despite plants being more varied and visible in our day to day lives? dont get me wrong, this isnt a swipe at plantkin or plants ( i love plants and my peace lillies are an obsession of mine), but it may seem confusing. I think for me, its the idea of sentience. despite how socially inept I may appear and act, I am still of a social species who craves connection. so despite loving and fixating on the natural world as a whole, I drifted towards the creatures in it, with reactions reflexes and understanding I understood and related to, as something living IN the world, rather than the idea of there being a world that just is. i breathed with lungs, i moved, sniffed the air and pawed at the grass. so it was natural to me that animals, being one and the same as those attributes, where what I observed the most. they were the antithesis of the modern society I found myself trapped in. they lived out there, in the wild, and they could. I found it wonderful and fascinating.
maybe thats why so many therians, though not all, take on creative or nature based careers. as a form of escapism. thats certainly the case for me, as someone soon to go to uni for zoology and conservation. its my happy place, my home. no city or street could ever compare, much as it should, and no person could hold my attention, fascinate or teach me as much with words as I would get from observing those of my kin. every morning when I go to feed the cats, we let out yowls of greeting that may seem strange to anyone else, but to me its the most natural thing in the world. saying hello is congnative effort, struggle and perception, predicting how someone else will react, lifting my tail in pleasure or flicking my ears or closing my eyes with trust feels so much easier, more complete- even if some of them arent even possible. instead of devoting thought to doing these things, like I do with most aspects of my day, I have to think about stopping them, holding them back, to fit in to human society.
hope this helps, sorry for the ramble and thanks for the read!
always happy to talk or expand on anything if you like 
-Rain
|
|
| RE: ✦ Alienation-based Psychological Theriantropy |
|
Posted in: Explanations of Therianthropy Posted by: LemLem - Yesterday 10:07
|
|
To answer your questions right away, and through, possibly reflect on the essay itself:
Did you feel disconnected from humanity before recognizing your nonhuman identity, or did that feeling develop afterward? Do you feel your nonhuman identity developed independently of your relationship with human society?
I've personally acknowledged my nonhumanity before I became aware/capable of understanding there was a wider human society to begin with, particularly my phantom wings. That was also around the time when I insisted that I was an anthropomorphized bear, though that phase fizzled out eventually.
My disconnect from humanity came once humans moved away from defaulting to my needs and desires, so away from childhood games and imaginative play and arts and abstract competition to a more concrete path towards reaching adolescent, then adulthood milestones. Goals which held no meaning or appeal to me, values that feel backwards. That is when, having been left alone on my side of the trench, I began wondering what am I if not a human like them.
So it evolved independently, but I wouldn't have realized it's deviant from human experience, wouldn't human society disappoint and frustrate me to its core.
Does the idea of nonhuman existence appeal to you because it seems more immediate or less burdened by human social expectations and/or abstract thought?
Nonhuman existence 'appeals to me' because it explains and validates my needs and desires and boundaries that seem in discrepancy from human ones, takes away possible shame and pressure to perform something alien to me. I feel confident to identify as my 'type instead of a human because it fits those much better. But it's also more than just environment that makes life, it's also the body you're experiencing the world in, and being Fae means being free of the corporeal shell I'm so uncomfortable in.
Have neurodivergence, trauma, disability, or other life experiences, such as your race or queerness, shaped how you relate to humanity or to your nonhuman identity? (Share only what you're comfortable discussing. I've read many threads on this forum about this question, so I already know that many of us see at least one of these aspects as fundamental to our identity.)
I'm neurodivergent, and that definitely introduces needs and functioning of the brain that the neurotypical world doesn't know how to handle and often doesn't like accommodating, but I grew up in a very neurodivergent-centric environment, and still grew alienated from my peers. At the end of the day, the people who fall within my marginal identities are still people, still human, with the same set of basic truths and aspirations I disagree with.
If alienation can lead people in so many different directions, what do you think makes an animal identity resonate specifically?
Many critters here inform their 'type search on mannerisms and body language that doesn't align with the 'correct' human one. Animals are well researched and, most importantly, observable, so it is possible to learn the patterns in their behaviour and lifestyles, which are then concrete frameworks for critters who don't feel human to compare with. With mythical creatures, extinct species, or even concepts, it's much harder to dig up any confirmable information to relate to.
It can also feel like a more concrete, confident explanation to present when confronted with why you feel a certain way about things that are natural to humans, why you seek solitude, etc., a more final argument than just calling yourself a recluse.
|
|
| RE: ✦ Alienation-based Psychological Theriantropy |
|
Posted in: Explanations of Therianthropy Posted by: Savva - Yesterday 4:09
|
|
Edit History
This comment is reserved to document the editing history of the essay, as I have a feeling it may be necessary :"]
Acknowledgements
I'm planning on crediting all contributors to this speculative essay/theory (oh, how intimidating it is to call it as such!)
I'm heading to bed for the night, this has already taken most of my day to proofread, edit, then proofread again, then edit to be BBCode-friendly, then add images so I don't melt any brains with the word count, so uh! See ya tomorrow! :]
|
|
| ✦ Alienation-based Psychological Theriantropy |
|
Posted in: Explanations of Therianthropy Posted by: Savva - Yesterday 3:09
|
|
Strap in, this is a long ride! I've been working on this essay
ever since I've registered on TG, and have thought about it for way longer than that.
Alienation-based Psychological Theriantropy
I've been thinking about some possible psychological factors behind therianthropy and wanted to share a theory I've been developing. I'd love to hear other people's thoughts, experiences, and criticisms!
This isn't meant to explain every therian's experience. I'm interested in exploring a possible connection between feeling alienated from humanity, being overwhelmed by it, and finding a sense of belonging in an animal identity.
Alienation
I wonder whether feeling disconnected from humanity or human society might be one possible pathway to therianthropy.
Human life is full of complicated social expectations, unwritten rules, cultural norms, and responsibilities. We're expected to understand how to behave around others, build relationships, pursue certain goals, and fit into a society with its own ideas about what a normal or successful life looks like.
Not everyone finds this natural. Some feel as though they're constantly trying to understand a world everyone else seems to navigate effortlessly, others disagree with the rules they're expected to follow. Our modern socioeconomic systems are also far removed from the environments in which humans evolved.
This can create a sense of alienation: feeling like an outsider, fundamentally different from other people, or simply not at home in the human world.
I wonder whether, for some therians, this feeling could contribute to the appeal of a nonhuman identity. That doesn't necessarily mean disliking people or struggling to form relationships. Someone can have friends, love their family, and enjoy human company while still feeling disconnected from humanity as a whole. They might participate in human society while feeling they must suppress parts of themselves to fit in.
Alienation can take different forms:
- Social: struggling to fit in with others.
- Cultural: rejecting society's expectations and values.
- Existential: feeling disconnected from what it means to be human.
P.S. Marx also had some interesting ideas about alienation under capitalism: how workers can become estranged from their labour, the products they create, one another, and even their own species-being. I wonder whether this kind of alienation might contribute to feeling like a lone speck in a world of institutions and machine. I'll leave the political side of this topic for another essay!
The perceived simplicity of animal existence
Human society is extraordinarily complicated. We have jobs, money, laws, bureaucracy, social hierarchies, and expectations about our futures. Many of our worries aren't about immediate survival, but about the systems we've built around it.
Animal life can look very different, at least from a human perspective. An animal's needs seem easier to understand: finding food and water, seeking shelter, avoiding danger, exploring, and interacting with others. Its life appears more directly connected to its body and surroundings than to layers of social expectations.
Of course, animal life isn't objectively simple or easy. Animals face hunger, injury, competition, predators, and complicated social relationships of their own. What interests me is the perception of simplicity.
For someone overwhelmed by human society, animal existence might feel more immediate and tangible, closer to one's body, surroundings, and basic needs. Most of us are far removed from the processes that sustain us: building shelter, hunting or growing food, and finding water. Our survival depends on complex systems that separate us from the things we need to live, making even fundamental needs feel abstract.
Animal life, by contrast, may appear more straightforward, with a more direct connection between an animal's actions, its environment, and its immediate needs.
The burden of human sapience
There’s another aspect of the human experience worth considering: our own minds.
Human sapience allows us to imagine, plan, and reflect, but it can also become exhausting. We worry about things that may never happen, replay embarrassing moments, imagine every possible failure, and get caught in spirals of anxiety or unanswerable questions. Our self-awareness can make us painfully conscious of our flaws, social standing, mortality, and the uncertainty of existence.
For some people, the mind can feel less like a tool they control and more like something they can’t escape. I wonder whether this might contribute to the appeal of animal identity.
When imagining life as an animal, one might picture an existence less dominated by abstract worries and constant self-evaluation. Instead of endlessly thinking about life, one might imagine simply experiencing it: exploring, resting, seeking comfort, and responding to the world around oneself. Perhaps there’s something appealing about being more present in one’s body and surroundings.
This isn’t to suggest that animals are mindless or free from suffering. Many have complex cognitive abilities, emotional lives, memories, and social relationships. Rather, I’m interested in how humans might imagine animal existence when exhausted by their own thoughts. It’s kind of ironic: imagining an existence free from human worries is itself an exercise of the cognition that can amplify those worries.
Within this theory, the burden of human sapience could be another source of alienation. Someone might feel not only out of place in human society, but also exhausted by their own mind. I wonder whether, for some people, exhaustion with human cognition might contribute to the appeal of a nonhuman identity.
The role of neurodivergence, trauma, race, queerness, and disability
These experiences can sometimes contribute to alienation, particularly through the ways people are expected to behave, how they're treated by others, and how comfortably they can exist in the world around them.
A neurodivergent person might find certain social conventions confusing or exhausting, or feel compelled to mask parts of themselves to avoid standing out. Someone who has experienced trauma might struggle to feel safe around others. A disabled person might face inaccessible environments, stigma, or expectations that don't account for their needs. People of color may feel alienated in predominantly white spaces, particularly when they experience racism, stereotyping, or pressure to navigate cultural expectations that don't reflect their own. Queer people may feel similarly when surrounded by assumptions about gender, sexuality, relationships, or what a conventional life should look like.
Such experiences can leave someone feeling that the human world wasn't built with them in mind.
However, none of these experiences is a requirement for therianthropy, nor does any of them automatically explain someone's identity. Not every person belonging to said groups feels alienated, and not everyone who feels alienated has these experiences.
Someone might simply have different interests, values, or priorities. They might feel out of place because their personality doesn't fit their environment, their interests or political views are uncommon where they live, or they've never felt particularly connected to mainstream culture. These factors may contribute to alienation for some people, but the relationship is likely individual and complicated.
Why animals, then?
Alienation from humanity doesn't automatically lead to animal identity. People respond to it in many ways, from alternative communities and creative pursuits to spiritual movements or a more solitary lifestyle. So what might make a nonhuman identity resonate specifically?
I suspect alienation alone isn't enough. There may also be an existing affinity for animals, a particular experience of one's body, or a sense of self that doesn't fit comfortably within human categories. Many therians report phantom sensations or feeling that their body doesn't match their internal sense of self, which may be analogous (or, somewhat opposite) to body integrity dysphoria. The latter usually means a desire to get rid of an existing limb, while the therian experience is generally a desire to have a limb your theriotype possesses, or for your limb to match that of the animal.
Animals might also feel easier to understand than humans, with more tangible needs and interactions that seem less dependent on complicated social conventions. For others, animal identity may offer a connection to the body, senses, environment, or instinct, or hold spiritual or emotional significance. Cultural associations with different species can shape these connections, too.
Still, I wouldn't want to reduce therianthropy to identifying with an animal because it represents qualities one admires. The experience can be much more fundamental to someone's sense of self.
Perhaps these factors can intersect with alienation to make a nonhuman identity meaningful, though this won't apply to everyone. Personally, I haven't met many therians who seem entirely comfortable in human society. I wonder whether this varies between species, particularly for those associated with strong social bonds or close relationships with humans, like dogs. I'd be interested to hear others' experiences.
A personal example
Part of what led me to this theory was reflecting on my own experiences. I can hold a job and be social, I’m generally able to make friends and interact with people, but I don't always feel comfortable being myself around them.
Social interaction can feel like following a set of mental rules: how I'm supposed to behave, which parts of my personality are appropriate to show, and whether certain interests might seem embarrassing. I can participate in human social life while presenting a version of myself that's easier for others to understand. There are spaces where I feel freer to express interests I'd otherwise keep to myself, such as niche online communities. Animals have also often felt easier to understand and relate to than people.
For me, the distinction between being able to function in human society and feeling like yourself in it has become an important part of how I understand my own nonhuman identity.
Of course, this is only my experience. A therian might feel deeply connected to human society and still experience a strong nonhuman identity. I include this example because outward social functioning doesn't necessarily reflect someone's internal sense of belonging.
Humanity's history with animals
I also wonder whether our long history with animals provides some context. Humans have lived alongside animals throughout our evolutionary history, relying on them for survival while developing deep cultural and spiritual connections with them. Animism, one of humanity's oldest and most widespread forms of religious belief, reflects worldviews in which animals and other parts of the natural world may possess spiritual significance or personhood.
Throughout history, animals have been revered, treated as kin, and associated with powers beyond the purely practical. These traditions don't establish that ancient people experienced therianthropy as we understand it today, but they show how deeply animals have shaped human understandings of existence. Beliefs in human-animal transformation also appear in many cultures, sometimes connected to spiritual practices or rituals.
Perhaps this longstanding connection helps explain why animal identity can hold such profound personal meaning for some people.
Identity and choice
People sometimes treat identity as either something we consciously choose or something completely fixed and unchangeable. I think there's room between these extremes, and that the therian community may sometimes place too much emphasis on therianthropy being entirely involuntary.
We can choose how to express ourselves: which labels to use, which communities to join, and how much of ourselves to share. But we can't necessarily choose the underlying feelings, preferences, or experiences that make these choices meaningful.
Consider someone who rejects modern society and technology (a Luddite, for this example) and would prefer a quieter life away from them. They might have to remain in modern society out of necessity, but that doesn't mean they can simply choose to enjoy the things they find alienating. Internally, they remain a Luddite, even if the life they’re living is forcing them to perform as an average person.
I think the same distinction matters when discussing therianthropy. Choosing a label or how to express an identity doesn't necessarily mean choosing the internal experience itself. An identity might develop through temperament, personal experiences, and self-understanding without being a conscious decision.
This doesn't mean identities are necessarily fixed from birth or can never be reinterpreted. It simply means that experiencing an identity and choosing how to understand or express it are different things. We may not choose what we feel, but we can still have some agency in how we make sense of it.
Conclusion
Putting these ideas together, I wonder whether one possible pathway to therianthropy might look something like this:
- A person has certain traits, experiences, interests, or ways of understanding the world. These shape how they relate to humanity, their own consciousness, and the nonhuman world.
- They may feel alienated from human society, overwhelmed by its expectations, exhausted by their own thoughts, or simply more connected to animals. Trauma, neurodivergence and disability may be large contributors in said feelings.
- These feelings may intersect with an existing affinity for animals or a particular sense of identity or bodily experience, making a nonhuman identity especially meaningful to them.
- Over time, these experiences may become part of how they understand themselves, even if they initially lack the language to describe them.
This isn't a universal sequence. Someone might recognize their animal identity before feeling alienated from humanity, or feel at home in human society while still experiencing a strong nonhuman identity. Alienation might shape how someone understands their identity rather than cause it, and vice versa.
Many people feel alienated without identifying as nonhuman, and some therians experience little alienation. I see this as one possible explanation for some experiences, not a universal theory of therianthropy.
I wonder if, for some people, animal identity resonates because it offers a way to understand themselves outside the expectations and complication of human life. Animals might represent an existence that feels more immediate, embodied, and connected to the environment, while our long relationship with them gives them a powerful place in our imaginations.
I also wonder whether modern life is so far removed from the conditions in which Homo sapiens evolved that it can leave us feeling disconnected from our own nature. Perhaps identifying as a nonhuman animal can feel more authentic, or better reflect a desire for a way of living that feels more instinctive and embodied.
And perhaps, for some people, the experience has nothing to do with alienation at all.
I'd love to hear what others think:
- Do you feel alienated from humanity, or comfortable being part of human society?
- Did you feel disconnected from humanity before recognizing your nonhuman identity, or did that feeling develop afterward?
- Does the idea of animal existence appeal to you because it seems more immediate or less burdened by human social expectations and/or abstract thought?
- Have neurodivergence, trauma, disability, or other life experiences, such as your race or queerness, shaped how you relate to humanity or to your nonhuman identity? (Share only what you're comfortable discussing. I've read many threads on this forum about this question, so I already know that many of us see at least one of these aspects as fundamental to our identity.)
- Do you feel your animal identity developed independently of your relationship with human society?
- If alienation can lead people in so many different directions, what do you think makes an animal identity resonate specifically?
Special thanks to everyone who has shared their theriantropy theories and experiences on this forum, as they have been fundamental to my ability to write this essay.
|
|
|