When coining terms, the coiner usually forgets, be it deliberately or not, to extend their terminology to broader audiences as to make new terms known. The disadvantage is that audiences forget to pick up on it, so that the work for those involved turns out in vain. To me, it just sounds as if coiners just want to feel special about themselves, thus breathing life into something that maybe isn't relevant or will be easily forgotten about instead. I'm with @
Song on this one. I like the terms to be broad and somewhat abstract, so that more people will actually question themselves or ask for advice before joining. These are discussion-heavy forums, so let the terminology be ready to allow discussion like that. Besides, when they're abstract, for people who define themselves as therians, it can be more comfortable for them to use them. Self-explanatory terms, microlabels or whatever don't have this advantage. They serve the purpose of this one dude (or lass), not necessarily representing the whole, wider community. I just want to stress how childish it can be to say "ooh, I know of a new term no one else knows about and sounds cool to use, so why not consider it a term everybody should know about from now on." But that's a bit of a long, unpopular phrase I should have cut into parts. Temporary popularity, in other words. Fame maybe? Heh, I don't know exactly what they're after...