RE: Why i think people are psychological therians
I'm not sure what you mean by being in love with dogs, to the point that you might as well have been one.
In my point of view, being in love with dogs is one of the consequences of my therianthropy, not the cause. If I wasn't so lucky, I might never have had one. Still, it is totally plausible that one can be a therian without having had pets. Besides, where does loving something touch your personality traits? No matter how much effort you do at loving something, you will never achieve the state of mind of the thing you love. According to my personal beliefs, being in love with something is fine, but I don't think it equals a chance to become the subject of your love. Therianthropy is something you were born with. With a pet, chances are higher that you might discover this part to yourself quicker.
Media might affect you similarly, too. Characters we relate to on a personal level affect us, might just push us to explore our deeper connection even better, but that's more of a lightbulb experience, to me.
I'm just saying that nowadays we don't have dogs anymore at home, but even without them, I am still very much canine to some degree.
|