(2025-07-05 12:45)Lupus Ferox Wrote:  Thanks @KevinLightning! That was an interesting take on your therianthropy I enjoyed reading! I don't have a narcissistic personality (I think that's what you meant - correct me if I'm wrong) myself but can relate to isolation in childhood and the struggle with connecting to people in general. I didn't have many friends either when I was young nor did I want to connect to others really. Not wanting to connect at the time is the reason why I think that nowadays my current struggles are so severe and my skills at socializing lackluster. I got blamed easily for either being emotionless or even selfish back then. Deep down, at my core, I know that that's not entirely true though. I do feel pretty intense emotions from time to time, as a matter of fact. Things that I don't want to feel all the time and therefore shield myself from them as a means to protect myself. Maybe it was better after all to learn how to connect, instead of being interested in things that were a bit out there, to be frank.

I think it takes a lot of effort to see yourself in such a realistic and matter-of-fact way, and know why you disagree with how some people see you. Very humble and tactful yet confident. I'm not sure if I have a narcissistic personality, that's just how people made me feel, it's probably true but I've learned how to focus on my inpact on other people because I really don't like being the center of attention.

I think all of us that withdrew from society when we were younger probably missed out on a lot of valuable experiences and things to learn, but I don't regret how I've gone so far. I've been lead down a pretty good path in life that I enjoy and I'm super grateful for it. I don't regret all the issues I had with people when I was growing up. But there's been a massive hole in my personality my whole life and I think it's from not feeling like I have a place I belong aside from in isolation. Never found my 'pack' ya know. But I've been doing a ton of work pushing myself outside of my comfort zone and I've gotten good at it. It's always important to recognize good progress. We all gotta keep pushing to find our kind of people I guess.

Thanks @KevinLightning! That was an interesting take on your therianthropy I enjoyed reading! I don't have a narcissistic personality (I think that's what you meant - correct me if I'm wrong) myself but can relate to isolation in childhood and the struggle with connecting to people in general. I didn't have many friends either when I was young nor did I want to connect to others really. Not wanting to connect at the time is the reason why I think that nowadays my current struggles are so severe and my skills at socializing lackluster. I got blamed easily for either being emotionless or even selfish back then. Deep down, at my core, I know that that's not entirely true though. I do feel pretty intense emotions from time to time, as a matter of fact. Things that I don't want to feel all the time and therefore shield myself from them as a means to protect myself. Maybe it was better after all to learn how to connect, instead of being interested in things that were a bit out there, to be frank.

(2023-06-07 15:05)indoraptor Wrote:  For me, I openly attribute isolation from, lack of socialization with, and trauma caused by humans from an early age to me identifying as & seeking community with other nonhumans.

My therianthropy itself, I feel, is more psychological than spiritual, yes — but I also feel that it is innate. I can’t tell you why I feel, think, and do some of the things that I do; whether I was predisposed from birth to be this way, or if I would have been different had I been a happier child — but I’m inclined to think that, whatever it is, it was Always inside of me, inside of my brain, my heart, what many would call my ‘soul.’

I relate to so much of this, specifically with how it feels innate, and that it's something that's always been a part of you or your 'soul' as you put it (I don't have a better term). Also with how your discovery of your therianthropy was the result of your upbringing and not that you became one.

I felt very isolated through my childhood, very few friends my age. A lot of that is my own fault, I never learned how to be a true friend to people early on and I was kind of narcissistic and indifferent to classmates growing up. It wasn't til high school that I learned what a true friend was like and I became even more disconnected from people around me after that. I'm lucky not to have experienced real trauma or abuse, but I always felt like I was less than human. I never felt a strong need to "fit in" and weird personalities were mostly accepted where I grew up but I was still singled out as the creepiest in school, I was made to feel like there was something extra wrong with me.

Since I was real little I always had some kind of strong canine connection. I feel it closer to my core than anything else, like a deep gut feeling. To let out wolf like movements and behaviors would just feel comfortable and please me in a way nothing else could, just felt right with my bones in a way I guess.

As I got older I started experiencing shifts but I didn't take myself seriously, I was already so weird why would I want to push that further? So I tried to bottle up and suppress what I believe what was my therianthropy for years, but it never left me, the urges to express the canine in me kept coming back stronger. Now I'm just trying to find people I can share these things with. I have some good friends nowadays but they don't relate to what I'm experiencing. But it feels great to read threads like this and everyones replies. Anyone else think there's a strong correlation between struggling to connect with people early on and discovering you're therian?

In my entire life that I lived so far I have never once felt entirely human. I have so many memories of feeling very cat-like when I was younger and canine like. I am so very many memories and so many feelings that I've had. I just always felt animal to some degree.

Even when I was younger I didn't even identify as human like that. I mean I knew I was one I felt like one but I couldn't help but also feeling like a cat. I would go so far to tell other people that I was a cat and that I was also a wolf. I remember telling people that I have a great sense of smell (I do not) an absolutely amazing hear (I'm actually hard at hearing and had to have hearing aids that one time) and I would tell people that I'm actually part wolf and I was not entirely human.

It just felt right to me. My entire life I felt animal to some degree, whether it's small or huge. I just never felt 100% human. I've always felt animal like to some degree.

Of course it could have been my imagination but I've also felt like other animals but not like how I feel with cats and red wolves. It was different and way stronger with felines and canines.

And my theory on why I'm this way is that I'm just am. I don't really want to worry about my origins and stuff I just believe that I am this way. there's no specific reason why I am this way, I just am.

That makes me believe that I am a therian :3

In regards to the theory that some canines/felines have their type wrong, maybe this story will help.

I had a “bat phase” in my teens. During this period, I was trying to see myself as a bat instead of a bird, and I even made a bat fursona. I really wanted to be a creature with fur and a cute snout and big ears, because I thought those things were cool. So when I was trying to create my ideal self, I meshed together the things I felt like I needed (ie. flight, long claws) and what I wanted (the mammalian traits). My fursona was basically a fox with wings. However, I couldn’t lie to myself for very long: my experiences have always been strongly avian.

As humans, we do seem to have this weird draw to canines and felines, finding them both cute and cool. At least in my case, once I’d already accepted that I feel like an animal, there was some wish-fulfillment element of “let me gather all the most beautiful and attractive traits to create an image of what I am.” But obviously, that isn’t very productive.

What’s interesting is that I think this explains a canine-feline identification in the TikTok therians, and some young people who haven’t gotten much of a chance to think about themselves yet, but there’s still quite a few canines and felines left over who seem very self-assured. There could be all kinds of explanations, some compelling ones being:
-Imprinting (we keep canine/feline pets)
-Genetic similarities (cats/dogs are mammals. You could reply to this by asking “where’s the primate therians then,” but my thoughts are that a lot of them don’t experience displacement or dysphoria to the extent of others because humans are primates).
Not much of an authority on the spiritual stuff, but those arguments are interesting too.

Not everybody is a therian. When I came out to a friend as being therian, they immediately reacted by saying "so what kind of animal am I?". They obviously hadn't done any kind of introspection beforehand and reacted as if this one fact had just changed their outlook on themselves and their world. It felt as though there even was excitement at play when they heard of this, other kind of excitement than what you would usually expect.

Of course, this is a one time event only. However, I'm not quite convinced that there are many therians globally. I am sure there are therians who don't know they're therians but to say that almost everybody is one, is beyond logical reasoning. We're a niche community, with a very varied share of opinions among its members.

I liked the first part of your theory, though. But I think it's a bit of a faulty comparison. How can I explain?

There are so many wolves because they're social animals so the majority of human beings identifying as therians have to be wolves, dogs or cat-like themselves. But what about reptiles or poultry, like somebody suggested a while back? One hundred percent of therians are human beings, human beings that live in social structures, the way we're all familiar with them. It's not because these human beings are social animals, their theriotypes have to be social themselves. I think theriotypes can go in all directions really, be it something extinct or non existent on this earth (theriomythics, the otherkin). Of course it's easier for a human being to relate to a wolf because of its hang for living in groups, if that human being is a social creechur themselves naturally. But I'm sure that there is an equal chance somebody is not a wolf or cat but is theriomythic, dragon-like or vampire instead. Perhaps we haven't heard of the real numbers of wolves that are out there. Maybe they are wrong about their theriotypes, aren't wolves or aren't therian altogether. What I would like to see is how many of us actually still believe they're a wolf therian, who isn't and then reduce the overall amount of therians by that amount who doesn't believe they're it anymore. I think the group believing in something else (non-canine or non-feline) will soon become much larger.

I think all these theories are lovely and have equal sustenance in terms of what could be most possible!

For me, I definitely grew up among felines (spotted ones, even), so I agree with the theory that a couple others have mentioned — as humans, we tend to bond most closely to those creatures which we grew up with, and so this may perhaps be a result of sub-conscious imprinting, or the urge to seek out something that you are familiar with. I’ve grown up with Bengal cats my whole life so far, so I definitely bond well with them and see myself in them, to some uncertain extent. But I actually didn’t immediately question any spotted felines as my initial ’type — I believe I had considered a tiger or lion.

I also agree with @/elinox, though, that this theory might not hold up with most feline therians. Pretty much all feline species with the exception of lions, domestic cats, and (to some extent) male cheetahs are solitary, and will act aggressively toward any feline that intrudes on its territory or personal space. For me personally, I know that my sociability stems from the fact that I am simply human at the end of the day, and humans are social creatures. We desire group compatability, even if we might prefer to spend our time alone sometimes. We desire to be heard and seen, validated. So I don’t think we can erase that part of us, and that definitely has to be recognised.

XX,
KK.

This topic is really interesting to me, since I do love to pick apart brain chemistry and figure out why humans and critters do the things they do, and I do have a few theories for this...

Like SillyKai said, a lot of folks may feel connected with their pets in some way. With dogs and cats being the most popular pets out there, I’m sure a lot of folks have had decent exposure to these creatures. Folks may see their pets as family, as a solace, as a safe place, and this mindset could strengthen if they’ve struggled with forming close bonds with humans...something that many neurodivergent folks struggle with, and I have noticed a great deal of therians being ND. Pets tend to love their owners unconditionally, unlike humans, and that’s where a sense of belonging could come in. Also the fact that pets don’t need to bond through speech could be a big contributor, since one of the biggest things that NDs struggle with is communication. When it comes to animals, as long as another animal isn’t a predator, prey, or trying to harm them for whatever other reason, then they’re fine with just...existing near each other. They don’t even have to speak

My other theory is how much we tend to observe in dogs and cats compared to other animals. When we’re exposed to a certain animal for a long enough period of time, we’ll notice little things in their behavior and think “huh, that’s a lot like me actually...”, and with dogs and cats being so common, of course folks will be observing them the most. Since we’re so used to any other kind of animal being territorial, asocial, and...a bit dim to be frank (since we don’t learn about them as often), it’s hard for people to relate to them. But both dogs and cats have the potential to show a more cuddly, social, and intelligent side to them when we bond with them and train them, making them more relatable. However, there could be folks who do feel a bit territorial and asocial (like yours truly), and they tend to gravitate towards more wild animals. They’re not quite as common, however, which is why dogs and cats are the more common theriotypes.

But, eh, those could be incorrect. That’s just what I’ve observed from watching the therian community and my theories are greatly based off of my own experiences. It could honestly be because of a whole slew of reasons, but who knows?

I think that there are more canine and feline therians because they have many varied characteristics, and it's easier to group your experiences into these very broad categories. Since they are both mammals, as are humans, it allows for a more direct connection on many different levels whether large or small. Also, young therians may be assuming that they are either a canine/feline because they are the most common, causing a greater influx in these therianthropes. (Although this is not the case for me because I have felt like a cat my entire life, even before discovering the term therianthropy) Many felines and canines have evolved alongside humans for thousands of years, and our societies/way of life has somewhat melded together.

(2022-05-07 6:45)DustWolf Wrote:  Thinking about it now, I also find myself wondering, since I believe animals can make choices in their lives: Perhaps it's possible for animals to do "good deeds for the community" (dharma). I mean outside of pets attending religious duties with their owners. Could a dog in what she does for her family be considered to engage in dharma?

Old post, but an interesting topic. There's a reason "all dogs go to heaven" is a common saying..

To the best of my knowledge, yes animals are thought to engage in dharma as they are viewed as sentient and capable of willful/mindful acts.

A few examples that I think support this:
There's stories in Japanese Buddhist mythology of animals engaging in dharma and becoming monks, and the endpoint of foxes in Japanese and Chinese mythology is to ascend to heaven through spiritual cultivation, which I believe represents liberation from Samsara (the cycle of rebirth). Apparently Thai Buddhism has stories of cats reaching states of enlightenment, as well. Religious Buddhist depictions also frequently feature animal symbols and deities with animal features that are representative of traits beneficial to the Noble Eight-Fold Path (way of living that leads to liberation from Samsara).

In Chinese Buddhism, Animals were said to aid the Bodhisattva Guanyin with her chores due to her innate goodness, suggesting those animals were capable of recognizing the Buddhist concept of "good" and chose to engage with its furtherance. This could be viewed as an analogue to what Gautama(Buddha) taught during his life, and an example of the innateness of "Buddha Nature" in animals.

Animals are also depicted as being able to engage in acts that bestow negative karma or go against dharma:
I would argue that the stories from Japan depicting pets who transform into "evil" monsters after abuse by humans was due to the introduction of hatred and attachment into creatures that formerly had none, causing them to fall away from the path to Nirvana as they seek retribution in a form those humans feared.

Some stories depict Nekomata (a type of cat yokai) as being able to raise the dead, which I believe could be viewed as representing a violation of the normal cycle of death and rebirth similar to how reanimation is viewed elsewhere. This might suggest the ability to engage with dharma negatively, and showing they are also capable of acts that are not in accordance with dharma. This suggests to me that animals are capable of making the choices required to reach Nirvana, even if they do not understand the path itself. Thus, they are pure beings that follow dharma instinctively, unless interfered with.