(2023-02-18 21:20)WolfThing Wrote: But in that case would 'he' not still work? If someone is a male wolf, would 'he' not still work?When we talk about male sea horses, female wolves, male hyenas, female rats...we still call them he/she when discussing those animals.
For me personally, being a "male wolf", "he" is just fine. Although as @Werewulfra pointed out and later explained, the reality of what this gender role actually represents is somewhat distant from the human masculine role (considering for example boldness and courage are human male virtues, but the opposite is true for wolves).
All that said, I should mention that I've had the personal experience of being segregated into the "it" category in school sports events during my younger years, due to my distinct physical attributes. I can't say it was a positive experience. From that I'd much rather be segregated into the male category than the neutral. Even if I am more wolf than man, so to speak.
(2023-02-18 21:20)WolfThing Wrote: If someone says gender = [asexual lizard species here, forgot name]...would 'they' not still work? As that's how we would refer to them anyway when discussing those animals.
I should mention that not all languages do genders in the way English does. In my native language (and I'm told it's similar in Japanese) "they" is a respectful form for both genders, that you would use to address, for example a stranger in a professional relationship, or an elder or whoever you wish to show respect to.
From that perspective it seems strange to me that anyone at all would be offended at being addressed as "they". Awkward and somewhat distant maybe, but not offended.
LP,
Dusty